Most attorneys have now used an AI tool. Far fewer can say what separates the chatbot on their desktop from an agent that runs an entire intake or records workflow from start to finish. That gap is where wasted spend and professional risk tend to live.

‍

Recorded live on October 22, 2026, this session is built for every level, whether you have never used AI or already rely on it daily. It covers what an agent really does, where the efficiency gains in a plaintiff practice are real, and where the work should stay with the attorney. The second half runs as an interactive game of Two Truths and a Lie across five areas of practice, with examples drawn from the record-heavy files that fill most Michigan dockets. It is a practitioner conversation, not a product demo.

‍

What You'll Learn:
  • The difference between a tool that responds and an agent that runs a multi-step workflow on its own
  • Which tasks in your own practice are best suited to an agent, plus a simple test for spotting the rest
  • Where to draw the line on decisions that stay with the attorney, and why
  • A practical verification habit: where AI errors tend to cluster, and what a source citation does and does not prove
  • The questions worth asking any vendor before you sign anything

‍

Please note: this on-demand recording is offered by Supio and is not eligible for CLE credit.

‍

This program was originally presented as a member education session for the Michigan Association for Justice. Supio is proud to be a Gold Sponsor of MAJ. This content is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

Panel

Bartley Billings
Solutions Consultant, Supio

See Supio In Action

Book a demo to see all the ways Supio can help your firm maximize settlements and take on more cases.